By Stephen George

New Housing policy stirs controversyStephen GeorgeAny issue that pits U of L students against administrative offices is bound

for controversial disagreement. And that is exactly what is happening

between on-campus residents and the Housing Division.

Over the past several years, the Housing Division has modified many of its

policies and procedures concerning residence halls. Two articles of debate

among students and the department this year are the increased monetary

penalties assessed to students who back out of their housing agreements, as

well as the shift to a lottery system for returning residents.

Since 1999, the state has been consistently reducing funding for university

programs. To help preserve limited state funds for academic programs, the

university has directed the Housing Division to become an auxiliary; that

is, to become self-sufficient.

Acting Director of Housing Shannon Staten said that, in order to maintain

optimal living conditions for students, the department has been forced to

impose these penalties. She said that the department’s budget must be

strictly adhered to. If not, the department would be losing money that is no

longer provided by the university. “If we can’t control the income

prediction, then it becomes a problem,” Staten said. “You budget for what

you think you’ll be housing, but if it falls below that percentage, all of a

sudden you’re not making your income.”

This year, if a student wishes to break his or her housing agreement, that

student must pay a minimum $200 penalty, only if they leave by June 30. If

the student decides to leave any time between July 1 and July 31, an

additional $500 cancellation fee is applied. And if the student leaves any

time after August 1, the student must pay the entire year’s rent.

“It’s becoming more apparent to me throughout this year of all the different

things they’ll charge,” said undecided freshman Morgan Durham, who disagrees

with the increased penalization policy.

“Basically, people have to stay in their room now, unless they’re rich,”

said John Daniel, Resident Student Association President and junior

Political Science major.

Staten partially blames the increase on the additional expenses for the

residence halls this year. For instance, the cost of phone lines for the

residence halls will increase 24% this year. The cost of Internet data lines

is going up 25%, while the maintenance costs, according to Staten, increase

5 to 10% each year, based on current energy costs. “The whole cost of living

has gone up quite a bit in the last year and a half,” she said. “Covering

the additional expenses, as well as becoming an auxiliary, is causing us to

raise rates. We have to be able to say that we’re a self-sufficient area,

that we make (monetarily) what we need. The quality of life for students

will suffer if we don’t have our consistent income.”

One of the implications of the increased penalties is that the campus is

becoming more freshman-based. Next year, only four of the eight residence

halls-Louisville Hall, West Hall, Wellness Hall, and Threlkeld Hall, which

will become exclusive to honors students-will be available for returning

students. The remaining four, not including Bettie Johnson Hall, will be

exclusive to freshman.

“What I don’t understand is why they’re trying to make this whole campus

freshman,” said sophomore Psychology major Alishia Shelton. “They’re pushing

us out.”

Freshman Biology major Paul Schlotterbeck attempted to explain. “I’d say

it’s helping the freshmen build a stronger community, an easier environment

to meet people,” he said. “But I can also see how upperclassmen would be

bothered by it.”

Yet another point of disdain among students is the Housing Division’s recent

shift to a lottery system for returning students wishing to live in the

residence halls. Students must first apply for a position in the lottery. It

works as regular lotteries do, as each application is assigned a number,

followed by a random drawing.

“We’ve looked at different procedures and policies over the years, and a

lottery seems to be the most fair way to at least give everybody a chance to

get a space,” said Staten. “There are more people than there will be space

(next year).”

Sophomore Math major Laundra Hawkins got a bad draw in this year’s lottery.

“That’s why I’m stuck in a freshman dorm,” she explained. “If you don’t get

your number pulled, you could end up not even having housing.” This seems a

harsh reality, but it is the truth. According to Staten, those whose numbers

are not drawn “must make their own arrangements.”

Shelton articulated an attitude, though not financially feasible, that is

common among many students. “With how much money we’re spending (on housing)

we should get a choice of where we want to live,” she said.

“It seems like a lot of student views aren’t taken into consideration,” said

freshman Durham. “They say we have a voice, but we really don’t.”

Many times ideologies run rampant. Unfortunately the confines of the

university sometimes don’t allow them to be realized.